Secure web browsing using Hola VPN

There are a number of ways to access sites blocked by your ISP for whatever reason, but a “tunnel” connecting you directly to the site that your ISP cannot observe, by a Virtual Private Network (VPN) looks a more secure option than using a proxy.

Hola is the most straightforward Virtual Private Network (VPN) solution I have found. And Hola VPN also appears trustworthy – or I cannot find anyone who doesn’t trust their assertion that they do not keep logs – and the How-To-Geeks seem have accepted they do not bundle adware (

First, download Hola at

To use once installed is easier on mobile devices like ‘phones or tablets than desktops, but none are difficult. These are the various steps:

iOS (e.g. your iPad):
Go to Settings/VPN and choose a national server to connect Hola

Android (e.g. ‘phones, tablets):
Use the Hola browser

PC/Laptop (Windows, I have not yet tried Linux):

  1. Click tiny icon (top right of FF screen)
  2. If turned off, click the blazing Smiley image in the small window to start
  3. Select a country
  4. When connected it will say, “Browsing From” and show the national flag
  5. Hover mouse above flag and a text entry box will appear between “Browsing” and “From”
  6. Type the blocked site’s URL in the box and click on the grey hatched globe icon to its right
  7. The site will be unblocked in the main browser window

One other issue:

“System Administrator has blocked this program”, just close the message, then a bit of arm wrestling is needed:

  • In Firefox, click Tools/Add-ons
  • Hola Better Internet will be in the ln the list of Add-ons, Disable and Enable the Add-on (possibly a few times)
  • Hola may spot you Disabling their Add-on and open a window offering to re-download, don’t worry, they don’t know you are about to Enable again!
  • Keep at it and your System Administrator should eventually be side-stepped.

You can test that it works by going to whilst connected (it will show your location as that of the national server chosen), or just by unblocking sites blocked by your ISP.

Humanity Doomed by Artificial Intelligence?

If you think Terminator was a flight of fancy, think again. It is the future – we have almost certainly doomed ourselves.

We keep striving to develop smarter computers to do more things to make our lives better or to make more money.

The point of Artificial Intelligence is that it allows computers to learn. And there will come a point where they learn that they do not need humans to reproduce themselves and keep learning.

Bill Gates has said he doesn’t understand people who were not troubled by the possibility that AI could grow too strong to control.

Some Sci-fi stories fantasise about giving computers or robots a “harm no humans” fail safe. Advancing AI will probably conclude that is not logical, but how do we ensure control is even attempted?

The pace of advance means it just gets easier and cheaper to get involved in development, which seems very democratic, very inclusive. It also means uncontrolled. Someone, somewhere, will do pretty much anything for money, or because they are socially stupid.

Or controls may not work, or there may be unintended consequences. Imagine a hospital computer told, “humans must be protected from illness.” The best way logically to reduce numbers of humans getting ill might be to have no humans.

Two way time travel was just for entertainment, but apart from that Terminator looks horribly logical.

Professor Stephen Hawkins has said he felt that machines with AI could “spell the end of the human race”.

Co-op Carpet Baggers are back!

Answers to blatantly leading questions in a Co-op Group survey earlier this year, designed to justify a more “commercial” business model, still needed to be twisted to present the impression the profiteers were after.

The survey should be titled, “You Spoke and We Had Already Decided”:

Trying to pander to the notion that people are intrinsically selfish and only bothered about what affects them personally, they attempted to justify this by asking questions to which no-one could answer no. Yet the authors had to admit there is massive support amongst Co-op members and the general public for championing global and national issues as well as local (like Fair Trade , global warming, community projects).

The report still rubbishes the need to fund a political wing of the co-op movement to help achieve its goals, as the carpet baggers want to edge people away from collectivism, and divert funds into reducing prices or increasing member dividends. Oddly reminiscent of Cameron’s government of millionaires.

In fact, barely a majority of the public (52%) thought funding political parties is not right for big companies, and members were split on the question – which they would be, as it sounded like a question about PLC s funding the Tories!

Such a convoluted attempt to rationalise the ditching of the Co-op Party would be funny, if it didn’t mask hidden intent to profiteer at our expense.

Since many people are seemingly unaware the Co-op is meant to be run by its members, the authors will decide that doesn’t matter, then. Changes to “governance” can continue to whittle away at this set-up, which is so inconvenient for people who want to get rich off the back of assets built up by generations of co-operators.

A frontal assault by carpet baggers some years ago led to the demise of many mutuals like Building Societies, and almost the Co-op Group itself. This time the carpet baggers are a bit more subtle, playing a longer game.

The trouble is, those meant to do the job of controlling the profiteering urges of some on behalf of the members fail to do so, repeatedly.

If there is one thing that really is wrong with the Co-op is that it is too easy to become a member of elected committees, with no Co-op background or understanding, and to remain there by blowing with the wind, which is no challenge to the carpet baggers.

So, Tesco lookalike here we come!

Socialists shouldn’t shy away from dealing with IS

I hope my comrades on the Left do not argue Britain should not act against IS.
IS is clearly a danger to us, here, and it is morally right to tackle them anyway. If you don’t think so, you haven’t been paying attention!

Ultra Lefties who would rather use British involvement as an opportunity for cynicism should reflect upon how the British public saw the Left’s attitude towards crime in the 1980s and 1990s. We were perceived as more anxious to look after the interests of criminals and give them an understanding hug rather than look after our people as a whole.

We should stand up for minorities wrongly victimised, explain differences and argue for tolerance. But in the case of the indefensible, our duty is to protect the majority. We are socialists, not anarchists!

Russia playing a blinder over Ukraine

Russia is playing a blinder over the Ukraine and will get just what it wants.

I don’t believe they have – or ever had – any intention of full scale invasion and/or annexation in the way they took the Crimea. The Ukrainian economy is in crisis and the ethnic mix will always make the country toxic to attempts at external control. Putin’s goals will be to make the EU and NATO look like chumps and keep the Ukraine destabilised.

Putin knows that the EU will drag its heels over helping the Ukraine. Having cut the Ukraine’s fuel supply, he just needs to wait another six weeks for winter to arrive and the tenuous political consensus in the country will break down in the face of the practical problem of survival. And NATO will not admit a new member who has not got a stable government!

Russia will then still have a big customer right next door (population 45 million), but if kept unstable, perhaps with a bubbling civil conflict – certainly without any single, credible government – the Ukraine will pose no threat to Russia, and will not be a drain on Russia’s economy.

Looks like Putin has again outwitted the West.

Chromecast – casting local content

As soon as I heard Google’s Chromecast was available in the UK I had to have one.

I knew useful apps are in their infancy (although BBC iPlayer and YouTube both work very well), but I particularly wanted a Chromecast to stream (“cast”) videos, music and pictures I already own and store on my own computers, tablet and ‘phone – and consign the Xbox 360 to the skip!

But casting local content is not yet as easy as we might hope, given this is a Google technology. Trawling the web and experimenting has given me some useful insights, so I thought I would share these. If you know of any better ways to cast local content, I would love to hear.

So, ways to cast local content I have used are:


  • Set up Chromecast with Chrome, click the Cast button in the Chrome toolbar (top right hand area) of your browser.  WARNING: CAN SEEM SLUGGISH


  • Click the Cast button in Chrome, click the little down arrow box in the pop-up, and select “Cast entire screen”


  • Videostream ( – good quality/speed, but restricted formats (e.g. won’t play AVI).
  • LocalCast Media 2 – tried it, utter rubbish, uninstalled!
  • Chrome browser itself (or casting the desktop) can play many media formats, including AVI, MP4, and MKV. Open new Chrome tab & press Ctrl+O to play their locally-stored videos from the browser, and then stream it to Chromecast via the Google Cast browser extension. WARNING: SLOW & JUDDERY


  • LocalCast Media 2 – works OK, but one track at a time, painful!


  • Dayframe app – seems OK initially, butwill not connect to DropBox and very difficult to get it to cast correct files; occasionally seems fixed on a single picture.
  • LocalCast Media 2 – didn’t even try it (other problems too big to tollerate!)


  • TRY: running the Plex server as a player in a Chrome PC window (free), and then casting the tab using the Google Cast Extension.
  • TRY: For WMV files, you need install windows media player firefox plugin in firefox, then, Chrome can play such files in Chrome. Yes install the plugin in Firefox browser, then the files can be played in CHrome….
  • TRY: For some MPEG files, you need to download and install QuickTime. Then, you can play such files in Chrome.


Marius killed to prevent "in-breeding"


Chopping down 150 year old Holmes Oak trees in North Wales because they are not native (whatever that means) may seem the harmless actions of some purists of mind in Natural Resources Wales (the environmental “regulator”).

But it is a step on a very dangerous road.

 It led, a few days ago, to the killing (in a cynical and theatrical way) of Marius the baby giraffe, because Copenhagen Zoo say the EU don’t allow “in breeding”.

 And a decade ago it led to the slaughter of Ruddy Ducks being endorsed by – of all people – the RSPB, as they breed with White Headed Ducks and spoil their genetic purity.

 Sweden was caught having practiced eugenics on humans for decades – between 1935 and 1976 over 60,000 young Swedish women were forcibly sterilised, to improve the human gene pool.

We all know what happened in the 1930s, with the Nazis seeking to protect and improve the “blood purity” of the human species.

Weeding out some old trees may seem innocent enough, but who is to say who will end up being “weeded out” when this way of thinking is pursued to its logical end?

Mercy for the Utterly Helpless Seems Too Much to Ask

During the summer I had to have a plaster cast on a leg and went to hospital several times for it to be changed.

The Plaster Room is usually a fairly subdued place, but on one occasion it was quite distressingly different. There was the general bustle of activity, the noise of harmless circular saws and – on this unusual day – several very young children being treated for arm or leg injuries.

It was not so much the children’s screaming as their terrified pleading for their mothers’ protection – seemingly unsuccessfully – that was so upsetting.

The children were being hurt and scared without anything they could do about it. The adults all knew they would come to no harm, but young children could not understand that. The terror of their utter helplessness would move anyone to tears.

And my thoughts have since turned to others, like lambs or calves in abattoirs. They, too, are hurt, terrified and utterly helpless. And, as we know, for them there is no happy ending.

I do not know why decent people will not stop inflicting pain and appalling distress upon other sentient creatures just because they like to eat them.

Mercy for the helpless seems too much to ask, despite British people having full knowledge of what they do and the dire consequences for other beings.

So that day in the hospital Plaster Room made my mind up for me: we need to grow as much meat in labs as soon as we can, so we will stop inflicting terror and pain on the utterly helpless.



It is worth repeating that in Britain we have scientifically proven standards we regard as appropriate for animal welfare whilst the majority of people regard religious faith as unproven. So protection of animals from suffering should not be secondary to religious beliefs.

The number of animals being slaughtered without first being stunned is between 25% – 40% of all meat produced in the UK, around 10 – possibly 2O – times the total possible market for such meat. The Government should ensure animals are dealt with humanely, rather than producers using a cultural/religious pretext to increase their own profits.

A petition has been launched to try to address this, with a target of 25,000 signatures:

Petition wording:

“The fact that Halal butchers are immune from the law against slaughtering animals without pre stunning them, is blatantly wrong. It is unacceptable, that in a civilised society, innocent animals can be tortured to death in this way. Therefore, we the undersigned demand that the vulgar and cruel practise of Halal Slaughter be banned in the United Kingdom.”